Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
Technology in a patent infringement case. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was correct when it ruled last year that the companies could not seek to
is equivalent to pairing with a specific user. This argument makes the assumption that each device is limited to just “one user.” Certainly in the case of in-ear headphones like AirPods, that claim
Nov 13 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a decision for Google (GOOGL.O) that overturned a jury's $20 million patent verdict against the tech giant over anti-malware technology
patent rights of biotech company TwinStrand Biosciences and the University of Washington. The jury said on Tuesday that Guardant's genetic-sequencing technology infringes two patents and that the
jury verdict for Teva in a separate patent case against Lilly over the same drug. Teva has since appealed the judge's ruling that the patents in that case were also invalid. Teva filed the lawsuit that
said on Thursday. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reinstated the case, finding that a California federal judge misinterpreted the patents when he found before
settlement" and asked the court to put the case on hold. An iFit spokesperson declined to comment and representatives for Dish did not immediately respond to a request for comment or more information on
Monday. The jury agreed with Flyp, that Google Voice, which allows users to send and receive telephone calls through the internet, violates Flyp's patent rights in technology used in its own
week-long trial, jurors in Waco, Texas, agreed with patent owner AlmondNet Inc that elements of Amazon's advertising platform infringe two AlmondNet patents related to personalized ad targeting. AlmondNet
argued was necessary after Albright "changed course" at the beginning of the trial on how a key part of the patent would be interpreted. The case is Paltalk Holdings Inc v. Cisco Systems Inc, U.S.
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
