Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
of the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) denying registration of a two-dimensional artwork generated by Creativity Machine, an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm created by Dr. Stephen Thaler.
In a trade secrets suit between Apple and medtech company Masimo over smartwatch technology, the Silicon Valley talent war is taking center stage against the backdrop of an AI boom and national
focuses on addressing copyright infringement related to the production of AI technology. The government is believed to have considered copyright infringement concerns raised by content creators, among
Meta, formerly known as Facebook, is set to release a commercial version of LLaMA, its open-source large language model (LLM) that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to generate text, images, and
) violations. In a recent court filing, Meta urged the court to throw out the claims made by the plaintiffs that the company infringed on the copyrights of their creative works in training its AI model.
In a move that should surprise no one, tech leaders who gathered at closed-door meetings in Washington, DC, this week to discuss AI regulation with legislators and industry groups agreed on the need
The tech giant announced last week the launch of its Copilot Copyright Commitment, designed to protect artificial intelligence (AI) customers worried about possible intellectual property (IP
machine learning — at a meeting of a Cultural Affairs Agency body on generative AI and copyright. The law’s Article 30-4 — newly established in a 2018 revision — allows artificial intelligence systems to
authors John Grisham, George R.R. Martin and Jonathan Franzen, against OpenAI and other tech companies over the alleged misuse of their work to train AI systems. The companies have denied the
activities were a reflection of the Plaintiff’s aesthetic judgments and personal choices in creating the final image. In the court’s hearing, the Plaintiff operated the same generative AI model
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
