, the examiner informed the applicant that the mark was devoid of any distinctive character as it would be perceived by consumers as a short animation or promotional film rather than as a sign
mark lacked “any distinctive character, both inherent and acquired through use”. The dispute was heard by the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition), comprised of Stéphane Gervasoni
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Super Simon found distinctive In case R 1490/2022-5 On 7 May 2019, the Dutch company Chiever B.V. filed an application with the EUIPO to register as a multimedia
The EU General Court has affirmed decisions that the signature word mark and logo belonging to HP Hewlett Packard Group are distinctive. The Second Chamber delivered judgment today, April 24 in two
total 1 pages, 4 items