Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
now resume. In a recent decision, the Paris Court of Appeal asserted its jurisdiction to rule on an infringement of Hutchinson’s patent in the UK and Germany (case ID: 22/16203). The judges, led by
On 23 September, the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) published two new regulations that will modify patent procedures when they come into force in October. Ordinance INPI
strives to position itself as a hub for technological advancement and research, the robustness of its patent system becomes increasingly critical. The recent amendments (2024) to the Indian Patent
Nov 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday that it would not reconsider a decision that invalidated a patent held by Return Mail Inc at the request of the U.S. Postal Service. The
The patent for locating avalanche victims that Ortovox is asserting against Mammut at the UPC is only valid to a limited extent in Switzerland, according to a new ruling by the Swiss Federal Patent
In May 2024, the Munich LD granted Dyson a preliminary injunction (PI) against certain SharkNinja vacuum cleaners. But last month, the UPC’s Court of Appeal (CoA) overturned that one. An order entere...
I. Determination of Protection Scope of the Patent for Invention or Utility Model (I) Principle of Interpretation for Determination of Protection Scope 1. Patent validity principle. Until the
173. The patent protects a method for browsing by walking. But a significant part of the case so far has involved the role and limits of UPC representatives working in-house. The situation becomes
patent litigation, the hurdle for that is high. The Dusseldorf LD clarified that the relevant period during which litigation must be brought begins with the identification of the last fact supporting
Institute of Microelectronics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences v. Intel Corporation, et al. in the Series of Patent Infringement Disputes Initiate protection of patent rights against Intel
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
