Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
Recently, Goelia Co., (Goelia) a women fashion clothing brand in Guangzhou, won Hangzhou Yapin Trading Co. Ltd.(Yapin) for malicious trademark infringement in the final judgment after two years
Chinese e-commerce platform Alibaba has accused a Dubai-based cryptocurrency company of operating an “unlawful scheme to misappropriate” Alibaba’s renowned brand name. In a trademark infringement
menswear brand Danhuoli was guilty of both trademark infringement and unfair competition practice. This is “significantly larger than the average ruling in trademark infringement cases in China
Swiss company Swatch Group has accused Samsung Electronics and its American subsidiary of infringing its trademark on designs for downloadable smartwatch faces. In the complaint, filed on Friday
Shoemaker New Balance has sued the owners of the Nautica apparel brand for design patent and trademark infringement. In the suit, filed at the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts, New
custom, in-house IP enforcement programs to give brand owners a pathway for relatively quick and efficient enforcement of trademark rights. As industrial products and replacement parts transition to these
against Fujian Tingfeilong Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. (福建省廷飞龙体育用品有限公司) for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Under Armour was founded in 1996 and as of 2018 had almost $5 billion USD in
continuous enhancement of brand value, Mixue has also become a key target for trademark infringement and unfair competition behaviors. In recent years, counterfeit versions of “Mixue” store or its
Recently, the Guangdong High People's Court issued a second-instance judgment in the trademark infringement and unfair competition case brought by Thom Browne Japan Co., Ltd. and Tumubulang (Shanghai
not infringe Jack Daniel’s trademarks. In 2017, the federal district court found that the toy constituted trademark infringement and dilution. The Ninth Circuit subsequently reversed key portions of
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
