Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
(RTTNews.com) - Apple Inc. ( AAPL ) has agreed to withdraw Samsung Electronics Co Ltd's (SSNLF) Galaxy S III Mini smartphone from its ongoing patent-infringement lawsuit against the South Korean
Google is close to paying a fine of $22.5 million to settle charges that it bypassed Apple users' privacy settings to track their online activities, US media reported on Tuesday. Google and the US
Facebook and Google are among a group of technology companies that has urged the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review its decision ordering Samsung to pay Apple damages for selling
The Supreme Court declined to resolve the issue of whether, for each of the Apple design patents in question, the relevant “article of manufacture” is the entire phone or a particular component
Apple Inc will appeal a trademark ruling to China's Supreme Court after it lost a four-year fight against a Beijing leather-products maker. The Beijing Municipal High People's Court recently ruled in
US tech giant Apple is involved in legal dispute in China again: the company is suing a Chinese government agency and a local company over a patent dispute related to Apple's Siri product. Apple
Samsung Electronics, the world's second-largest maker of mobile phones, took a critical turn recently in a patent war with its smartphone and table computer rival Apple. A senior Samsung executive
Licensing company VirnetX Holding Corp has been awarded $502.6 million by a jury after it found that Apple’s FaceTime infringed four communication technology patents. Judgment was delivered at the US
Technology company Samsung has been ordered to pay Apple a total of $539 million in a long-running patent dispute. The sum was decided by a jury at the US District Court for the Northern District of
Apple has failed to convince Singapore’s IP office that Swatch’s applied-for trademark ‘Tick different’ is confusingly similar to its registration for ‘Think different’. The Intellectual Property
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
