dissimilar. Like the Opposition Division, the board concluded that there was no likelihood of confusion between ‘Eiskeller’ and the earlier registered ‘Keler’ marks. On appeal to the General Court
phonetically. With ‘tèespresso’, the board said the signs were highly similar phonetically. The board therefore found there was a likelihood of confusion with ‘Tpresso’ in both cases. Italytrade appealed to the
this year. According to the federal suit, “The differences between the parties’ trademarks and manners of use prevent any likelihood of confusion. ... There are numerous O marks, O-formative marks
Division further agreed that the goods and services at the issue were identical but there was no likelihood of confusion between the two. EUIPO’s Fourth Board of Appeal dismissed the appeal made by
BrewDog’s applied-for mark would cause confusion with one of its earlier trademarks if it was registered in classes 40 and 43. Doghouse Distillery’s earlier trademark is for a dog’s head in black and
confusion; (2) Sections 8(4)(b)(i) and 8(4)(b)(ii) – that the Application Mark was similar to the Opponent’s trade marks, which were allegedly “well known in Singapore” or “well known to the public at large
determining that Cai submitted no evidence. In addition, the Federal Circuit said that the TTAB did not err in finding that a likelihood of confusion exists between Cai’s mark and Diamond Hong’s
(CJEU) rejected an appeal by BMB in its entirety, ruling that the General Court was correct in its earlier judgment. The General Court had previously determined that there was a likelihood of confusion
Colorado-based Goode Enterprise Solutions has denied comic book company Marvel’s accusations that a trademark for ‘Return of the Guardians’ would cause confusion. On Saturday, April 6, Goode
similarity of design and lack of similarity of sales to the same retail outlets” between Vive and Lacoste’s products. Additionally, Vive said that no actual confusion had occurred and that there is