Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
Brooks Brothers Group Inc. announced that it has filed a response and counterclaim against Brooks Sports, Inc. for breach of contract, trademark infringement, dilution and unfair competition. The
, the Supreme Court of Korea has sided with Hermès, holding that PLAYNOMORE’s handbags amount to unfair competition. In a decision late last week, a panel of judges for the Supreme Court of Korea
Defendants had registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith, and their acts had constituted unfair competition. The two Defendants asserted that they had only provided temporary template
Recently Alfred Dunhill Limited instituted a proceeding against Guangzhou Dengxi Shijia Leather Products Co. Ltd. and Bairong World Trade Center for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The
order of market competition and protect the interests of consumers. I. Rigid and fair enforcement of law to create a market environment with fair competition In the recent years, with the increasing
infringement, trademark dilution, counterfeiting, and unfair competition claims in its lawsuit. The convenience store chain said that the fashion brand uses a model wearing the shirt and “unmistakeably
found liable for copying the 3D artworks for 18 Lego sets and multiple Lego mini figures, along with carrying out unfair competition acts, according to a press release from Lego. The district court
American Airlines has settled a trademark and unfair competition lawsuit with US-based travel agency Expedia. The airline filed the suit in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
and unfair competition. Lacoste allegedly demanded that Vive destroy products “with no resemblance to Lacoste’s IP”, and pay the French company an “exorbitant sum” in order to avoid damages “which
exclusive rights in its marks, with bad faith intent to cause confusion, the complaint alleged. The energy drinks brand also accused Quality of trademark dilution and unfair competition. In its complaint
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
