Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
On 12 February, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled in case T-187/24 concerning the EU trade mark "Caprizza" owned by the Italian company Sirl Biif. In 2022, the Italian company appli...
On 12 February, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-434/23 related to an application for an EU figurative mark representing a leaf. In 2017, Swedish company Essity Hygiene and Heal...
On 6 November, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-1146/23 on a dispute between the EU trade mark Cardioflow (N. 018115661) and the earlier word mark CARDIOFORM (N. 013592035). In ...
On 20 November, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled in case T-1163/23 concerning EU trade mark No. 015171234, PREDATOR, owned by Taiwanese tech company Acer Inc. In 2017, Polish compa...
The Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) and Cambodia’s Ministry of Commerce (MoC) recently held discussions on plans to establish a National Trademark and Brand Management Centre aimed at
, Connecticut-based Rise sued Pepsi for trademark infringement later that year. It argued that Pepsi, which also distributes Starbucks coffee drinks, was trying to "destroy a leading competitor" by flooding
On 23 October, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-523/23 on a dispute between the international trade mark FRUITOLOGY and the earlier Portuguese trade mark CENTRO DE FRUTOLOGIA. I...
On 23 October, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-59/24 on a dispute between the EU trade mark INSOMNIA ENERGY and the earlier EU trade mark M MONSTER ENERGY. In 2016, a company b...
Chinese liquor brand Langjiu (郎酒) has won a significant trademark lawsuit against its rival Yelanggujiu (夜郎古酒), securing 196 million RMB in compensation, according to an announcement made by
Inc.’s vehicle logo, which constituted trademark infringement. As a result, NIO was awarded 300,000 RMB in compensation. Earlier this year, NIO sued BSWolf at the Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
