Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
The Munich Regional Court’s 7th Civil Chamber has judged pool rates offered by Sisvel for Wi-Fi technology to be fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND). This ruling by a world-leading patent
the patent with restrictions. The judgment has since become final, so the infringement proceedings focused solely on whether claim 12 was infringed. Although Oppo had invoked a FRAND compulsory licence
In the pan-European dispute between ZTE and Samsung, the 7th Civil Chamber of Munich Regional Court has set out new approaches to FRAND proceedings. These deviate from the Higher Regional Court's
VS Samsung FRAND Judgement
the plaintiff ZTE, lawfully determined a full set of global cross-licensing terms consistent with the FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non‑discriminatory) principle, and ordered Samsung Electronics to pay
case is that the Delhi High Court established the burden of proof rules for FRAND disputes in domestic SEP infringement cases. The court pointed out that the starting point for reviewing a FRAND
) royalties. Previously, OPPO requested the Chongqing No.1 Intermediate People's Court to determine the global FRAND rates for the Nokia SEP portfolio, and promised to accept the rates decided by the
The maker of Wi-Fi routers says the Chinese tech giant reneged on its commitments to license standard essential patents on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms to its competitors. LOS ANGELES (CN) ...
Today the UPC has handed down its first FRAND judgment. In a surprising turn of events, the local division Mannheim has banned Oppo from selling certain mobile devices in the UPC territory and
FRAND-related case, ruling in favour of South Korea’s Pantech in its 4G LTE standard-essential patent (SEP) infringement suit against Google. What’s new: Pantech has since filed a petition with Tokyo
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
