Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
Netflix have been embroiled in a separate patent dispute since 2018 over Netflix's alleged infringement of Broadcom patents related to video streaming technology, with cases in California, Germany
Mundipharma does not have to pay Glenmark damages for the cancelled launch of a generic painkiller. Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court has upheld last year's first-instance decision, rejecting Glenmark...
on MED-EL's infringement suit. The UPC local division in Mannheim had already prepared its ruling by 8 May, with presiding judge Peter Tochtermann keeping it under wraps. Now it will never see the
a new benchmark for trademark infringement cases in Thailand. 4. Paying a daily penalty of THB 100,000 commencing from the date of the lawsuit filing, March 4, 2024, and continuing until such
Recently, the local division Düsseldorf issued a preliminary injunction in proceedings between Hoffmann-La Roche and Menarini over CGM devices. Various providers of this lucrative technology are curr...
Slip-on trainers are known in Europe primarily through Nike, which licenses the technology from patent holder Kizik. Now global footwear brand Skechers has entered the market and faces infringement
CosMX has been ordered to pay RMB 9.9 million in damages to its rival Amperex Technology Limited (ATL) in a patent infringement case, as per a recent ruling by the Fujian High People’s Court. The
judgment. The parallel infringement proceedings will now continue. Last week, the Federal Patent Court confirmed the validity of Newron’s EP 2 474 521 (case ID: 3 Ni 24/23 (EP)). The patent protects a
fruits constituted infringement, and dismissed all of the defendant's defenses, including claims that the trademarks were generic variety names or lacked distinctiveness. Both the claimant, Company X
partially redacted), and its European partners at the Düsseldorf Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). The action alleges infringement of three core European patents owned by Shockwave. Shenzhen
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
