a recent court decision denying registrability of AI created work, the U.S. Copyright Office recently issued a formal notice of inquiry seeking public comments to help analyze AI’s copyright
15. Ian Liu, a partner at Deacons in Hong Kong, said AI service providers shall comply with the laws in pre-training and optimization training under the Interim Measures. The scope of compliance
In less than a year, generative AI has transformed notions of what computers might be capable of. Now, we’re in the midst of a heated debate about what role computation will play in the future of art
Although still in their infancy, a growing number of recently-filed lawsuits associated with generative artificial intelligence (AI) training practices, products, and services have provided a
, against the developers of some of the most well-known generative AI products on the market, including OpenAI, Inc. (OpenAI) and Alphabet Inc./Google LLC (Google). On 28 June 2023, for example, in P.M. v.
Three major music publishers, Universal, Concord and ABKCO, filed a complaint against the new AI company Anthropic for copyright violations, according to legal documents obtained Wednesday by
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Purpose. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds
AI-created works would not be protectable. While this is true for works created exclusively by AI, what has been largely ignored is how a work co-authored by a human and a generative AI can garner protection
The plaintiff used a U.S.-based text-to-image artificial intelligence (“AI”) service to generate an image of a woman that he posted to a lifestyle platform called Xiaohongshu, also known as “Little
China’s Beijing Internet Court(BIC) has made a first-instance judgment on the first copyright case in the field related to AI-generated images. The Court found that the defendant’s conduct