Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
Biogen may not use a specific composition with the monoclonal antibody adalimumab in its anti-rheumatic drug Imraldi, marketed in Germany. Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court found Biogen's biosimilar i...
The global dispute between SAP and Celonis is entering a new phase. Following reciprocal lawsuits in the US and at the UPC, Celonis has filed infringement suits against the DAX-listed group over
its trade secrets, as well as to stop the development, production, and sale of the accused infringing weighing products. In addition, Pinnacle demands compensation for the infringement and related
Chinese video surveillance giant Hikvision has been hit with a 10.31 million yuan patent infringement lawsuit by competitor Hongmen Group, a national high-tech enterprise specializing in intelligent
Abbott has secured a victory at the UPC in its dispute over glucose-monitoring devices. The local division The Hague issued a preliminary injunction against Sinocare and Menarini. The decision in anot...
BMW faces three infringement suits from Onesta at the Regional Court of Munich concerning processor technology for head units in cars. Two of the lawsuits are based on US patents. The NPE and law
HEVC-related patent infringement action initiated by Huawei at the UPC. Previously, Huawei filed similar lawsuits against companies such as Roku and Transsion, successfully leading to patent license
On March 6, 2026, the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) issued two crucial rulings in the patent infringement dispute between Dyson and Dreame, marking significant progress in this
On May 18, 2026, the Delhi High Court in India issued an appellate judgment in the patent infringement case of Philips v. Indian DVD manufacturers K.K. Bansal and Rajesh Bansal, setting aside the
brands. The High Court of Justice in London ruled in 2022 that Samsung had committed trademark infringement. Samsung appealed, arguing that the watch faces were uploaded by third‑party developers
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
