Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
Digital Copyright Ten Major Typical Cases 1.Short Video Copyright Case: Whether a Short Video is Original Has Nothing to...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
On May 18, 2026, the Delhi High Court in India issued an appellate judgment in the patent infringement case of Philips v. Indian DVD manufacturers K.K. Bansal and Rajesh Bansal, setting aside the
brands. The High Court of Justice in London ruled in 2022 that Samsung had committed trademark infringement. Samsung appealed, arguing that the watch faces were uploaded by third‑party developers
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has issued a pivotal ruling in the nearly three-year-long patent infringement dispute between U.S.-based Eastman Kodak Company and Japan's Fujifilm Corporation. The
On March 30, 2026, the Delhi High Court (DHC) delivered a final judgment in the patent infringement dispute between Communication Components Antenna Inc. (CCA) and the Rosenberger Group and its
338, and EP 13 31 974). As early as 2017, Sony Interactive Entertainment and its French branch had filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Subsonic in France, alleging that the latter's
On May 4, 2026, the Milan Central Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) issued a landmark judicial ruling, completely revoking European Patent No. EP 3854403 held by the Academy of Military Medic...
Sniffing” technology, holding that no infringement was established, dismissing the appeal, and upholding the original judgment. In 2024, a Beijing-based cultural company filed a lawsuit against a
Recently, ImberaTek LLC filed three separate patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of Texas and the Western District of Texas, naming three major consumer
The Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province has recently concluded the first-instance trial of the first virtual goods trademark infringement case. This case has clarified that the
, Ltd. and two other defendants regarding trademark infringement and unfair competition. The court ultimately ordered the three defendants to jointly and severally pay economic losses and reasonable
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
