South Korea's Supreme Court ruled Feb 26 that altering LV bags for private use doesn't infringe trademarks, overturning ...
Singapore intensifies digital piracy crackdown with fourth Sim Lim Square ISD seller conviction, imposing prison, fines,...
The Suzhou Intermediate People's Court overturned the first-instance ruling, finding that the Chinese company's imitatio...
South Korea's Supreme Court ruled Feb 26 that altering LV bags for private use doesn't infringe trademarks, overturning ...
On July 21, 2025, Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court ruled defendants liable for "G. Patton" trademark infringement an...
Mixue Bingcheng sues Zibo Bingyu Time for trademark infringement, unfair competition; court rules in its favor, orders c...
On 26 February, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-1066/23 on the likelihood of confusion for conce...
On 19 March, in case T-400/24, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled on the distinctiveness of a EU trade...
On 12 March, in case T-1187/23, the General Court of the European Union ruled on a dispute regarding the proof of the ge...
On 13 February, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-361/24 on the distinctiveness of a trade mark co...
On 12 February, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-434/23 related to an application for an EU figur...
On 12 February, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled in case T-187/24 concerning the EU trade mark "Capr...
On 5 February, in case T-195/24, the General Court of the European Union ruled on the distinctiveness of a trade mark co...
On 8 January, in case T-20/24, the General Court of the European Union rejected the application for registration of the ...
On 11 December, the CGEU ruled in case T-157/24 concerning the EU word mark No. 018416564, CHIPSY KINGS, owned by Mr And...
On 20 November, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled in case T-1163/23 concerning EU trade mark No. 0151...
On 20 November, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled in case T-376/23 concerning the EU word mark No. 01...
On 11 December, the General Court of the European Union (GCEU) ruled in case T-1163/23 involving the EU trade mark "Glas...
Saule Kulzhambekova, partner at Bolotov & Partners in Almaty, said that in the recent trademark infringement case won by...
On 13 November, in case T-82/24, the General Court of the European Union rejected the application for registration of th...
On 6 November, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-544/23 on a dispute involving PUMA's figurative m...
On 6 November, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-1146/23 on a dispute between the EU trade mark Ca...
On 23 October, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-59/24 on a dispute between the EU trade mark INSO...
On 23 October, the General Court of the European Union ruled in case T-523/23 on a dispute between the international tra...
On 12 June, in case T-343/23, the General Court of the European Union had to decide whether the sign 'Beyond Chocolate' ...
On 19 June, in case T-312/23, the General Court of the European Union issued a decision in a dispute between the EU trad...
On April 26, 2024, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC), China’s top court, released the 2023 50 Typical IP Cases. One of ...
Case Brief: La XX Winery is the owner of the trademarks "LAFITE" and "CHATEAU LAFITE ROTHSCHILD" (hereinafter referred t...
April 26, 2024 - A specific color or color combination can be the subject of common law trademark protection and/or fede...
In case T-117/23, the General Court of the European Union examined a trade mark dispute concerning an application for an...
In ruling dated December 18, 2023, the Madhya Pradesh High Court provided clarification on filing an infringement suit u...
Appeal Number Rejection 2023-000826 (JP Appl. No. 2022-040333) Case Summary BORMIO is not perceived as a place of origin...
Nov 13 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Monday said the phrase "Everybody vs. Racism," cannot be granted a trademark ...
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
Home
